Comments on: Reader’s Digest

By: J. Parkss

J. Parkss — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:40:10 +0000

My version showed up without a table of contents. I had to just start at the first article of the file and next-page through. You have no idea what articles are included in this months magazine. Therefore, I canceled.
Rating: 2 / 5

By: V. Gallagher

V. Gallagher — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:43:30 +0000

My first edition was Dec 09 and loved it. Had everything but the ads! Now I don’t feel guilty about getting rid of a magazine that’s still in good condition.
Rating: 5 / 5

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:45:44 +0000

at 14 years old and reading this i know good between great. the stories are very informative but it is definately a magazine for adults. i am not to picky about what i read but this magazine could do much better connecting with its readers. if you like informative reading this is definately the magazine for you. but if you like stories you can connect with go buy a book or a different magazine.
Rating: 3 / 5

By: I. Waugh

I. Waugh — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:22:00 +0000

Way low fidelity. It’s like reading basic html pages. It’s fine for newspapers and I’m fine reading the WSJ this way but I miss the images, color, and the visual experience of reading a magazine. I admit that I may be biased since I work for a company that produces, sells and distributes digital magazines that are exact replicas of the print edition…
Rating: 1 / 5

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:11:21 +0000

i love humor and gossip and this is not my type of magazine no way
Rating: 1 / 5